Yes, I did say that. Because it's true - Morrowind is extremely unbalanced and its combat is bad. I can say things like that and still like Morrowind because I can look at it objectively and understand that for all of its virtues, Morrowind is an imperfect work.
Then you must understand why people love Skyrim. There is no point having the: "Skyrim has bad mechanics and it is totally unbalanced as an argument" when you recognize that even such games can be so enjoyable. You just "confessed" that someone can enjoy an unbalanced game with crappy combat mechanics, then I really don't understand why can't you acknowledge the fact that Skyrim is a potentially good. All you keep doing is denying all the good things I say about it, even implying that its popularity doesn't add nothing to its value.
Why is this so hard for you to accept it? As I said in my early posts, Skyrim is about exploring and it does that pretty well, hence its success, despising if you personally like (or not) the way its exploration mechanics play.
I'm totally willing to have this discussion, but only if you'll engage in it on a higher level than "Skyrim doesn't have faults because it sold a lot and I like it."
Please, don't distort my point of view or my sayings. I simply said that a game that sells so well can't be that flawed as you seemed to imply. Go and re-read my previous posts. I never said at any time that Skyrim is perfect nor I would ever attempt to imply that Skyrim is awesome just because I like it. I do believe that if many persons like a game then there is a chance it is a good game by offering way more positive than negative experiences.
If we are going to have this discuss I need you to stay coherent throughout the whole part of it. Coherency is the key to maintain a viable discussion.
